| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 187 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 195 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 1 unit | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 283 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 7 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 572 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 185 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 674 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 1 unit | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 1 unit | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 8 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 33 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 27 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 969 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 43 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 1452 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 132 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 32 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 15 units | |
| 2016-03-10 | Class II | Process design | Software anomaly; Siemens identified that software version 1.4.2133 on the ADVIA 560 Hematology System does not trigger the following flags: The G or L morphology flags for immature granulocytes (IG) and atypical lymphocytes (ATYP), respect | US: 8 systems; Foreign: 64 systems | 2018-06-07 |
| 2013-08-12 | Class II | Software design | Siemens determined that if an autosampler rack jam error occurs during operation of an ADVIA 2120/2120i connected to an ADVIA Autoslide, it is possible that the next slide processed by the Autoslide could be labeled with the wrong sample id | 311 units total (US: 51 units; Foreign: 260 units) | 2015-11-18 |