| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 187 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 195 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 1 unit | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 283 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 7 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 572 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 185 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 674 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 1 unit | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 1 unit | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 8 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 33 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 27 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 969 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 43 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 1452 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 132 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 32 units | |
| 2021-03-05 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential Sample Identification (SID) Mismatch with14-Character Barcodes | 15 units | |
| 2016-10-21 | Class II | Software design | Siemens is investigating an issue which may cause an incorrect result to be reported. Siemens received two reports of multiple discordant records for the same Sample ID in the ADVIA 560 Hematology System database that occurred during the in | US: 23 systems; Foreign: 141 systems | 2018-06-07 |
| 2016-03-10 | Class II | Process design | Software anomaly; Siemens identified that software version 1.4.2133 on the ADVIA 560 Hematology System does not trigger the following flags: The G or L morphology flags for immature granulocytes (IG) and atypical lymphocytes (ATYP), respect | US: 8 systems; Foreign: 64 systems | 2018-06-07 |
| 2013-08-12 | Class II | Software design | Siemens determined that if an autosampler rack jam error occurs during operation of an ADVIA 2120/2120i connected to an ADVIA Autoslide, it is possible that the next slide processed by the Autoslide could be labeled with the wrong sample id | 311 units total (US: 51 units; Foreign: 260 units) | 2015-11-18 |