Sirus®
Locking screw ø4.9x100 self tapping
17manufacturers in China registered for this device type
45catalogue numbers in this listing
23510(k) clearances naming this product code
40recalls on this code
Who Else Makes It
Concentrated in Jiangsu (7), Shanghai (3), Zhejiang (3). 10 of them are registered as contract manufacturers, able to build to a buyer’s own specification.
| Manufacturer | City | Province | Registered as | Device types |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang Biomet Medical Products Co., Ltd. | Jinhua | Zhejiang | Contract manufacturer | 74 |
| Apex (Guangzhou) Tools & Orthopedics Company | Guangzhou | Guangdong | Contract manufacturer | 62 |
| Changzhou Biomet Medical Devices Co., Ltd. | Changzhou | Jiangsu | Contract manufacturer | 54 |
| Paragon Medical Device (Changzhou) Co., Ltd. | Changzhou | Jiangsu | Contract manufacturer | 53 |
| Canwell Medical Co., Ltd. | Jinhua | Zhejiang | Contract manufacturer | 42 |
| LX Precision Shanghai Co Ltd | Shanghai | Shanghai | Contract manufacturer | 19 |
| Stryker (Suzhou) Medical Technology Co., Ltd. | Suzhou | Jiangsu | Contract manufacturer | 19 |
| Suzhou Ahno Medical Devices Co., Ltd. | Suzhou | Jiangsu | Contract manufacturer | 17 |
| Turnxon Precision Co., Ltd. | Dongguan | Guangdong | Contract manufacturer | 17 |
| Suzhou Kangli Orthopaedics Instrument Co., Ltd. | Zhangjiagang | Jiangsu | Contract manufacturer | 11 |
| Zimmer (Shanghai) Medical International Trading Co., Ltd. | Shanghai | Shanghai | Exporter | 106 |
| Shanghai JPY ION-Tech Co., Ltd. | Shanghai | Shanghai | Contract manufacturer | 70 |
Showing 12 of 17. All 17 manufacturers in China registered for Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories
Record
| Listed by | Zimmer, Inc., United States |
|---|---|
| FDA product code | HSB |
| Device type | Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories |
| Device class | Class 2 |
| Regulation | 21 CFR 888.3020 |
| Establishment | Contract manufacturer, Specification developer, Repacker / relabeller, Manufacturer, Exporter |
| 510(k) | K043270 |
| Record published | 2016-08-29 |
| Record revised | 2025-02-06 (version 5) |
Specifications
| MRI safety | Labeling does not contain MRI Safety Information |
|---|---|
| Sterilisation | Moist Heat or Steam Sterilization |
| Supplied sterile | Yes |
| Single use | Yes |
| Prescription | Prescription only |
| Label carries | lot or batch number, expiry date, manufacturing date |
| Sizes | Length 24 to 100 mm; outer diameter 3.9 to 4.9 mm |
Catalogue Numbers
| Catalogue number | Size | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 02.02149.046 | Length 46 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.080 | Length 80 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.026 | Outer Diameter 4.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.040 | Outer Diameter 4.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.113 | Length 48 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.085 | Length 85 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.102 | Length 26 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.044 | Length 44 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.032 | Outer Diameter 4.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.103 | Length 28 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.107 | Outer Diameter 3.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.024 | Outer Diameter 4.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.090 | Outer Diameter 4.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.052 | Length 52 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.116 | Length 54 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.076 | Length 76 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.095 | Length 95 mm | In distribution |
| 02.00020.049 | In distribution | |
| 02.02149.060 | Length 60 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.106 | Length 34 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.101 | Outer Diameter 3.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.105 | Length 32 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.100 | Outer Diameter 4.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.114 | Outer Diameter 3.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.050 | Length 50 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.028 | Length 28 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.038 | Outer Diameter 4.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.115 | Outer Diameter 3.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.109 | Length 40 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.112 | Length 46 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.111 | Outer Diameter 3.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.108 | Length 38 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.048 | Length 48 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.064 | Length 64 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.068 | Length 68 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.030 | Outer Diameter 4.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.054 | Length 54 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.042 | Length 42 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.034 | Length 34 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.056 | Outer Diameter 4.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.058 | Length 58 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.036 | Outer Diameter 4.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.110 | Outer Diameter 3.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02100.104 | Outer Diameter 3.9 mm | In distribution |
| 02.02149.072 | Length 72 mm | In distribution |
Same Product Code
| Product | Sold by | Catalogue numbers |
|---|---|---|
| T2 | Stryker GmbH | 1,373 |
| Autobahn | Globus Medical, Inc. | 1,258 |
| Gamma | Stryker GmbH | 1,120 |
| Summa Orthopaedics Femur Nail System | Jeil Medical Corporation | 742 |
| Arix Femur Nail System | Jeil Medical Corporation | 742 |
| Orthofix | Orthofix SRL | 721 |
| Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories | Synthes Gmbh | 715 |
| Trigen | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | 681 |
| Arthrex® | Arthrex, Inc. | 665 |
| Precice® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System | NuVasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | 596 |
| Apex | Orthoxel Designated Activity Company | 569 |
| Natural Nail® | Zimmer, Inc. | 552 |
Showing 12 of 2,207. All products under Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories
510(K) Clearances
| Clearance | Decision date |
|---|---|
| K253566 | 2026-03-12 |
| K243907 | 2025-02-12 |
| K241651 | 2024-09-26 |
| K200814 | 2020-04-28 |
| K192312 | 2019-10-11 |
| K191238 | 2019-07-05 |
| K181827 | 2018-12-14 |
| K172114 | 2017-08-10 |
| K143321 | 2015-05-29 |
| K142281 | 2014-10-22 |
| K130595 | 2013-09-17 |
| K120715 | 2012-08-10 |
| K101622 | 2010-10-01 |
| K091566 | 2009-10-28 |
| K090596 | 2009-06-30 |
| K083497 | 2009-02-19 |
| K082770 | 2008-12-11 |
| K043270 | 2005-01-31 |
| K032367 | 2003-08-12 |
| K972692 | 1997-09-19 |
| K965098 | 1997-02-28 |
| K962561 | 1996-09-25 |
| K853250 | 1986-02-12 |
Recalls Naming This Product
2 recalls name this product by its own identifiers, the 510(k) it is cleared under.
| Recalled by | Identified by | Initiated | FDA class | Root cause | Reason | Quantity | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zimmer, Inc. | 510(k) number | 2012-09-04 | Class II | Error in labeling | Zimmer Inc., is initiating a correction to the patient labels of products manufactured before March 20I0 by the Zimmer GmbH production site in Winterthur, Switzerland, after receiving four complaints of a discrepancy between product patient | 195 | 2014-04-16 |
| Zimmer, Inc. | 510(k) number | 2009-03-23 | Not classified | Other | The package is labeled as containing 330 mm length nails, but actually contains 300 mm length nails. | 32 | 2009-10-23 |
Recalls
40 of these are Class II. Class II means a temporary or reversible health consequence. Volume alone is not a quality signal: a manufacturer that ships more recalls more.
| Initiated | FDA class | Root cause | Reason | Quantity | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 24 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 22 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 24 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 23 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 22 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 11 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 22 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 24 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 22 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 23 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 3 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 22 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 23 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 24 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 24 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 23 | |
| 2025-12-02 | Class II | Process design | Affected implants may have undersized distal diameter along length of the shaft, which could lead to implant fatigue fracture. Potential health risk if implant fatigue fracture occurs include adverse local tissue reaction, pain or ache, non | 11 | |
| 2021-05-07 | Class II | Process design | Zimmer Natural Nail (ZNN) System-CMN Femoral Nail potential commingle between CCD angle 130 degree and 125 degree | 16 units | 2024-04-18 |
| 2021-05-07 | Class II | Process design | Zimmer Natural Nail (ZNN) System-CMN Femoral Nail potential commingle between CCD angle 130 degree and 125 degree | 8 units | 2024-04-18 |
| 2019-10-10 | Class II | Packaging change control | Non-highly polished implants may adhere to the LDPE bag (previous packaging configuration). | 5,459,583 total devices | 2020-05-19 |
| 2019-10-10 | Class II | Packaging change control | Non-highly polished implants may adhere to the LDPE bag (previous packaging configuration). | 5,459,583 total devices | 2020-05-19 |
| 2019-10-10 | Class II | Packaging change control | Non-highly polished implants may adhere to the LDPE bag (previous packaging configuration). | 5,459,583 total devices | 2020-05-19 |
| 2018-07-30 | Class II | Mixed-up of materials/components | The item is labeled as an 8.3mm, but it is actually a 12 mm. | 1 unit | 2019-10-24 |
| 2018-03-26 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential failure of sterile packaging seal. | 19483 total products | 2020-11-18 |
| 2018-03-26 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential failure of sterile packaging seal. | 19483 total products | 2020-11-18 |
| 2018-03-26 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Potential failure of sterile packaging seal. | 19483 total products | 2020-11-18 |
| 2017-04-28 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Zimmer Biomet is initiating a field action for sterile-packaged implants packaged in a single package configuration due to packaging design verification test failures. | 1707 | 2019-05-15 |
| 2017-04-28 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Zimmer Biomet is initiating a field action for sterile-packaged implants packaged in a single package configuration due to packaging design verification test failures. | 1499 | 2019-05-15 |
| 2017-04-28 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Zimmer Biomet is initiating a field action for sterile-packaged implants packaged in a single package configuration due to packaging design verification test failures. | 27279 | 2019-05-15 |
| 2017-04-28 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Zimmer Biomet is initiating a field action for sterile-packaged implants packaged in a single package configuration due to packaging design verification test failures. | 24969 | 2019-05-15 |
| 2017-04-28 | Class II | Under Investigation by firm | Zimmer Biomet is initiating a field action for sterile-packaged implants packaged in a single package configuration due to packaging design verification test failures. | 3856 | 2019-05-15 |
| 2017-02-28 | Class II | Packaging | Zimmer Biomet Inc. initiated a field action on 02/28/2017 for sterile-packaged implants packaged in two different package configurations due to packaging design verification test failures. | 9867 | 2018-02-27 |
| 2017-02-28 | Class II | Packaging | Zimmer Biomet Inc. initiated a field action on 02/28/2017 for sterile-packaged implants packaged in two different package configurations due to packaging design verification test failures. | 9867 | 2018-02-27 |
| 2017-02-28 | Class II | Packaging | Zimmer Biomet Inc. initiated a field action on 02/28/2017 for sterile-packaged implants packaged in two different package configurations due to packaging design verification test failures. | 9867 | 2018-02-27 |
| 2017-02-28 | Class II | Packaging | Zimmer Biomet Inc. initiated a field action on 02/28/2017 for sterile-packaged implants packaged in two different package configurations due to packaging design verification test failures. | 9867 | 2018-02-27 |
| 2017-02-28 | Class II | Packaging | Zimmer Biomet Inc. initiated a field action on 02/28/2017 for sterile-packaged implants packaged in two different package configurations due to packaging design verification test failures. | 9867 | 2018-02-27 |
| 2017-02-28 | Class II | Packaging | Zimmer Biomet Inc. initiated a field action on 02/28/2017 for sterile-packaged implants packaged in two different package configurations due to packaging design verification test failures. | 9867 | 2018-02-27 |
| 2017-02-28 | Class II | Packaging | Zimmer Biomet Inc. initiated a field action on 02/28/2017 for sterile-packaged implants packaged in two different package configurations due to packaging design verification test failures. | 9867 | 2018-02-27 |
| 2017-02-28 | Class II | Packaging | Zimmer Biomet Inc. initiated a field action on 02/28/2017 for sterile-packaged implants packaged in two different package configurations due to packaging design verification test failures. | 9867 | 2018-02-27 |
| 2017-02-28 | Class II | Packaging | Zimmer Biomet Inc. initiated a field action on 02/28/2017 for sterile-packaged implants packaged in two different package configurations due to packaging design verification test failures. | 9867 | 2018-02-27 |
Source: U.S. FDA establishment registration and device listing records, public domain. Restructured for clarity and searchability. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA. Records are records: nothing here is an offer of sale.